← All posts

Editing the whole shoot

Templates and batch processing bring one considered edit to an entire shoot, holding the look consistent across every frame while cutting the time and the tokens it takes to get there.

A shoot is not one photo. It is a few dozen frames of the same dog on the same dock in the same light, and they need to look like they belong together.

They are not the same photo, though. The light shifts between frames, the dog moves, one shot has a mooring post standing in the water and the next does not. Copy the layers from the first onto the second and you land close, then spend longer fixing the places it does not fit than you saved by copying.

What a retoucher does instead is repeat the process rather than the settings, and get quicker with every pass. The first frame takes the longest because it is where the decisions happen. By the tenth you are not really deciding any more. You are fitting a treatment you already trust to a picture that is slightly different from the last one.

Editmamei works in that shape. You spend the time getting the first photo right, then carry the process forward and let the exact values follow each frame.

That is what a template is, and it covers the creative half of a shoot. There is a second feature for the half that is only filing.

Templates carry the look

What gets saved is not a preset or a stack of sliders. It is the recipe: what the look is for, the conditions it assumes, the ordered steps with their real values, which settings should flex from photo to photo and which must not, and how to tell whether it landed.

Applied to the next frame, Claude works through that recipe rather than starting over. It reads the photo first, then fits the treatment to what is actually there. A shaded frame gets more exposure. A post in a different place gets a different selection. A frame with no dog in it skips the steps that were about the dog. The values move; the intent does not.

That is also what keeps the intent alive at frame thirty. A recipe that says keep the dog tan rather than orange holds long after you have stopped watching closely.

Batch carries the filing

Some of the work is not creative at all. Cropping a finished set to 4:5 for Instagram, resizing, exporting. It is identical on every file and it still has to happen.

Photoshop has its own batch engine for this, and Editmamei can compile the job and hand the whole folder over at once rather than opening, cropping, exporting and closing each file in turn.

What that saves

Editmamei works through your AI subscription, so every edit draws on your plan. Both features exist to keep that draw down, and I wanted to know by how much.

Editing one photo from a plain description, with nothing prepared in advance, took a little over twenty minutes. Claude looks at the picture, settles on a treatment, tries it, checks the result, changes its mind, tries again. Most of the cost sits in that loop.

Then the finished look, saved as a template and run across ten photos.

The ten finished in about the same time as the one, for about the same budget. The first photo pays for the decision and the rest inherit it, and the effect compounds: the step from one photo to three still costs real money per frame, while the frames after that cost very little.

The batch side has a different shape. On ten files, handing the set over came in around a third of the time of working through them individually. File by file, every photo you add is another round of instructions. Handing the set over stays flat. Ten files was three instructions, and a hundred files would still be about three.

A template knows what it is for

A recipe carries the conditions it was built for, and that turns out to be worth as much as the settings.

I built one on a clear bright morning, then pointed it at a different day: heavily overcast, white sky, no blue anywhere. Before touching a file, Claude read the conditions written into the template, held them up against the new photos and said this was the wrong template for this shoot.

That is the part I would not want to give up. We ran it anyway, to see what wrong looked like, and it was exactly as advertised. The treatment applied perfectly, the same on every frame, no drift at all. It was also wrong on every frame with much sky in it, all of which came out looking like the air was full of smoke.

The reason is specific. On a blue sky, the warmth in that recipe is held in check by the work it does on the blue channel. An overcast sky has no blue in it, so nothing balances the warmth and it lands on a flat grey field. Different light needs its own template rather than a nudge to one slider.

A template that knows what it is for can tell you when you are about to use it somewhere it does not belong. Before fifty photos come out wrong, rather than after.

Templates and batch are both Pro features. If you have a shoot sitting on a drive waiting for an evening you never quite get, there is a seven-day free trial: have a look at the plans.

— Alex